Rook

If you’re running storage in Kubernetes and want to stay fully cloud-native, chances are you’ve heard of Rook. It’s a storage orchestrator that helps deploy and manage storage backends like Ceph, NFS, and others inside your Kubernetes cluster.

It’s a popular choice for teams looking to keep storage close to their apps, without relying on external systems. But while Rook solves key problems around automation and integration, it doesn’t eliminate the operational complexity that comes with running storage inside Kubernetes.

Here’s what Rook does well — and where it falls short when it comes to performance, ease of use, and scalability.

What Rook Does

Rook is an open-source operator that runs in Kubernetes and manages storage platforms like Ceph. It automates deployment, configuration, and management of storage clusters using Kubernetes-native tools.

Instead of provisioning storage outside the cluster and plugging it in, Rook helps you run it all natively, making storage part of your Kubernetes control plane. You define storage resources using YAML, and Rook handles the rest: pod scheduling, recovery, scaling, and health checks.

It’s a good fit for teams that want full control of their storage stack without leaving the Kubernetes environment. 

🚀 Using Rook to run databases on Kubernetes?
See how teams simplify persistent storage without managing Ceph.
👉 Run production databases on Kubernetes without the Rook complexity

When Rook Makes Sense

Rook works for infrastructure teams that are already running Ceph or have the expertise to manage distributed storage systems. It’s one of the more direct ways to deploy Ceph inside Kubernetes, but it comes with real complexity.

Running Rook means taking on the full operational overhead of Ceph: tuning monitors, managing OSDs, handling upgrades, and debugging across layers. It also involves managing CRDs, node placement, and ensuring data durability — all within your team’s scope.

Some teams use Rook in edge or air-gapped environments where managed cloud storage isn’t an option. But that flexibility comes at a cost, which is why many eventually move to simpler, cloud-native alternatives designed for Kubernetes from day one.

Common Use Cases for Rook

• Running Ceph natively in Kubernetes clusters
  
• Building distributed block or file storage with open-source tooling
  
• Operating in edge or air-gapped environments without external storage access
  
• Creating multi-tenant persistent storage systems
  
• Replacing traditional SAN or NAS setups with software-defined storage
  

Key Features of Rook

Rook isn’t a storage engine — it’s a storage orchestrator. That means it handles lifecycle management: deploys the storage backend, configures it, monitors health, handles failover, and simplifies day-two operations.

You can use it to manage Ceph for block, file, or object storage. It supports integration with Kubernetes PVCs, custom resource definitions (CRDs), and built-in monitoring via Prometheus.

That said, the reliability and performance of your setup still depend on the storage engine underneath, typically Ceph.

Comparing Rook + Ceph vs Simplyblock

While Rook makes it easier to run Ceph in Kubernetes, it doesn’t fix Ceph’s challenges. Simplyblock offers an alternative that’s designed for container-native environments from the ground up, without the manual tuning or maintenance overhead.

Where Rook Starts to Struggle

Rook simplifies orchestration, but it doesn’t simplify Ceph. Operating Ceph at scale still means managing placement groups, OSDs, monitors, CRUSH maps, and tuning for latency or replication. Upgrades can break things. Debugging is time-consuming. And even small mistakes can cause major disruption.

For teams that need reliability and performance without a full-time storage expert, Rook often introduces as many headaches as it removes.

If you’re feeling these limitations, you might already be evaluating Ceph alternatives or trying to reduce ops load through platform-native options.

Why Teams Are Moving Away from Rook

• Too much complexity for small or fast-moving teams
  
• Difficult to tune and maintain for production use
  
• High operational overhead for scaling across clusters or zones
  
• Long learning curve for teams new to Ceph
  
• Frequent reliance on community fixes for stability issues
  

What You Gain by Choosing Simplyblock Instead

Simplyblock gives you the benefits of Kubernetes-native storage — dynamic volumes, high performance, failover, multi-zone support — without needing to run a complex storage backend like Ceph.

It’s optimized for cloud-native workloads, scales automatically, and works out of the box in your Kubernetes cluster. That means no tuning, no manual upgrades, and no fighting with custom storage topologies.

You still get flexibility, but without the ops overhead. Some teams have even replaced older setups based on ZFS with Simplyblock’s ZFS alternative for easier integration.

Storage That Fits Modern Kubernetes Workflows

Rook is powerful, but it’s not simple. It gives you Kubernetes-native control, but demands deep knowledge of the underlying storage engine. That trade-off may work for large teams with dedicated SREs and infrastructure specialists. But most teams today want fast, reliable storage that just works.

If you’re looking for Kubernetes-native storage without complexity, Simplyblock offers the path forward — no extra tooling, no hidden tuning, no steep learning curves.

Questions and answers