Broadcom’s per-core licensing model changed the renewal economics for vSAN customers in ways that compound over time. Every server added to the cluster, whether for compute or storage, adds to the annual software invoice. Teams whose clusters are growing are seeing that invoice increase in a way the previous per-socket model did not produce.
The goal of this promotion is to make the first year of the migration substantially easier to justify. Infrastructure teams running the cost comparison between continued vSAN renewal and a move to disaggregated NVMe storage can include up to 1 PB of free first-year storage in that model.
How the migration works in practice
Most teams use a phased approach: simplyblock is introduced as a new storage tier alongside the existing vSAN deployment. New Kubernetes workloads, new VM disks, and new persistent volumes land on simplyblock from day one. Legacy VMs stay on vSAN and migrate progressively over six to eighteen months, aligned with the normal workload refresh cycle. No freeze or big-bang cutover required.
Read the cost comparison
The detailed cost model for a 200-core vSAN cluster is in the vSAN exit cost economics post. For a broader comparison of vSAN alternatives including architecture, operational model, and Kubernetes fit, see best vSAN alternatives 2026.
Talk to us before your next renewal
Talk to a storage architect to get a model for your specific cluster size, workload mix, and timeline.